The Sovereign Recycling Dilemma: Structural Failures and Global Dependency in Australia’s Soft Plastic Packaging Sector

The Australian waste management landscape is currently defined by a profound paradox: while domestic environmental consciousness and consumer demand for sustainable packaging are at historic highs, the physical and economic infrastructure required to support a circular economy for soft plastics has undergone a systemic collapse. This failure is most acutely visible in the e-commerce sector, where the rise of "recycled" and "sustainable" mailers has created a complex web of global dependency. Analysis indicates that Australia is caught in an "import-consume-dispose" cycle, wherein the vast majority of recycled-content products are manufactured overseas, often utilizing non-Australian waste, only to be imported and ultimately consigned to domestic landfills because local recovery systems cannot process them. The suspension of the REDcycle program in late 2022 served as the catalyst for a broader reckoning regarding sovereign recycling capability, revealing that the "green" transition in the packaging industry is currently built upon a foundation of offshore manufacturing and insufficient domestic market demand.[1, 2, 3, 4]

The Anatomy of Systemic Failure: The REDcycle Collapse and its Aftermath

The collapse of REDcycle, which for over a decade served as Australia’s only national soft plastic collection and recycling scheme, represents the most significant failure in the history of the domestic resource recovery sector. At its peak, the program claimed to collect approximately five million items per day through a network of more than 2,000 supermarket drop-off points.[5, 6] However, the reality behind these figures was a mounting crisis of stockpiling and limited processing capacity. By the time the parent company, RG Programs and Services Pty Ltd, was declared insolvent in early 2023, an estimated 11,000 tonnes of soft plastic waste—comprising bread bags, snack wrappers, and bubble wrap—were found languishing in 44 secret warehouses across the country.[1, 2, 7]

This failure was not the result of a single error but a confluence of technical, economic, and logistical factors. The primary recycler for the program, Close the Loop, suffered a catastrophic fire at its Melbourne facility in mid-2022, which effectively neutralized the only significant pathway for turning soft plastics into asphalt additives.[5, 8] Simultaneously, the pandemic-induced global shipping crisis and the collapse of international markets for low-grade recycled plastics left the program with no viable outlet for the material it was collecting. The resulting stockpiles represent a "legacy of distrust" that the current Soft Plastics Taskforce—composed of major retailers Coles, Woolworths, and Aldi—is still struggling to remediate.[7, 8, 9]

Geographic Distribution of Legacy Soft Plastic Stockpiles (October 2024 Data)

State/Territory	Tonnes Remaining in Stockpiles	Remediation Status
South Australia	3,953	Highest regional volume; ongoing processing [7]
New South Wales	3,120	Moderate reduction; limited by facility capacity [7]
Victoria	2,360	Near primary processing hubs; highest clearance rate [7]
National Total	~11,000	Remediation expected to continue into 2025 [1, 7]

Evidence suggests that even at the program’s peak in 2022, it was only recovering about 7,500 tonnes per annum, which constitutes less than  of the total 538,000 tonnes of "flexible" plastic waste generated by Australian households and industries each year.[1, 2, 10] This highlights the staggering gap between the perceived efficacy of supermarket drop-off schemes and the industrial reality of Australia’s plastic waste generation.

The Global Supply Chain Paradox: Offshoring the Circular Economy

A core requirement of the transition to a circular economy is the "buy-back" phase, where materials are reprocessed and remanufactured into new products within the same economic ecosystem. In Australia, this cycle is fundamentally broken. Data indicates that approximately  of the 4.2 million tonnes of plastic used in Australia annually is imported, either as new plastic resin or as finished products and packaging.[4, 11] This globalized supply chain has created a situation where the "recycled" packaging seen on Australian supermarket shelves and delivered via e-commerce is almost entirely manufactured in Southeast Asia, China, or Vietnam.[12, 13, 14, 15]

The Mechanism of Waste Onshoring

The mechanism of this paradox is twofold. First, Australian retailers and e-commerce brands seek to meet sustainability targets by purchasing packaging with high recycled content. However, due to the high costs of energy, labor, and logistics in Australia, it is significantly cheaper to manufacture these products overseas. Second, the "recycled" plastic used in these overseas factories is often sourced from international waste streams (e.g., Ocean Bound Plastic from Indonesia or Malaysia), meaning that the material was never part of the Australian circular economy to begin with.[14, 16, 17]

When these products arrive in Australia, they serve their single-use purpose and then enter the domestic waste stream. Because Australia lacks the facilities to recycle these specific types of soft plastics—particularly when they are contaminated with shipping labels and adhesives—they are consigned to landfill. In effect, Australia is "onshoring" plastic waste that has been reprocessed elsewhere, leading to a net increase in the total volume of non-recyclable soft plastic within the country.[4, 18]

Economic Comparison: Domestic vs. Imported Resin and Manufacturing

The primary barrier to domestic remanufacturing is the "uneven playing field" created by global market prices for resin. Analysis shows that brand owners naturally prioritize lower costs, which favors imported virgin fossil-fuel-based plastics over Australian-made recycled content.

Material Category	Price Premium relative to Virgin Plastic	Estimated Market Share
Imported Virgin Resin	(Baseline)	[4, 19]
Imported Recycled Resin		Emerging; preferred by brands [4]
Australian Recycled Plastic		(Currently at risk) [4, 19]

The experience in Europe indicates that without regulatory intervention to prioritize local recycled content, domestic recycling plants face closure as they are undercut by cheap, often unverified imported recycled materials.[18, 19, 20] In Australia, utilization of existing domestic plastic recycling facilities is currently hovering at only  and is projected to fall as low as  by 2030 if policy reforms are not enacted to mandate the use of locally reprocessed materials.[4, 20]

Technical Barriers to Domestic Recovery and the "Wish-Cycling" Phenomenon

The inability to "get rid of" soft plastics in Australia is deeply rooted in the technical limitations of traditional Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs). Most Australian MRFs were designed to sort rigid containers (glass, PET, HDPE) and fiber (paper, cardboard). Soft plastics, characterized by their low density and high surface-to-volume ratio, are a "nightmare" for these highly automated systems.[21]

The Machinery Entanglement Crisis

In a typical MRF, soft plastics do not behave like other recyclables. Instead of being sorted into discrete categories, they tend to behave like "ghosts" in the system, wrapping around rotating screens and clogging conveyor belts. This machinery entanglement causes frequent operational stoppages, increases maintenance costs, and can even pose physical dangers to workers.[21, 22, 23]

Beyond the physical clogging of machines, soft plastics present a polymer complexity problem. Modern packaging often utilizes multi-layered packaging (MLP), where layers of different plastics (e.g., LDPE and PP) are bonded with aluminum foil or specialized coatings to provide oxygen barriers for food freshness.[21, 22, 24] These layers cannot be separated mechanically, making the material impossible to recycle back into high-quality packaging using current Australian infrastructure.[21, 25]

Factors Inhibiting Soft Plastic Recovery in Australia

• Polymer Contamination: A single bale of "soft plastic" might contain seven different polymer types that melt at different temperatures, making the resulting recycled resin brittle and of low commercial value.[22, 25]

• Organic Contamination: Unlike rigid plastic bottles, which are easily rinsed, soft plastics (like bread bags or meat trays) often contain food residues and oils that are labor-intensive and costly to clean.[21, 22, 23]

• Infrastructure Scarcity: Nationwide, only 10 Local Government Areas (LGAs) have the technical capacity to accept all types of plastic bags and films in their kerbside bins.[26]

• The "Repurposing" Mirage: Much of what is currently reported as "recycling" in Australia is actually "repurposing" or "downcycling." For example, soft plastics turned into park benches or road base are participating in a single-use re-purpose rather than a circular economy; they cannot be recycled again and will eventually end up in landfill.[27, 28]

Case Study: The E-commerce Packaging Industry and Recycled Mailers

The e-commerce sector represents the vanguard of the sustainable packaging movement, yet it also perfectly encapsulates the failure of the Australian circular model. The surge in online shopping has led to the consumption of millions of poly mailers, many of which are marketed as "eco-friendly" because they are made from  recycled content or are certified compostable.[16, 29, 30]

Manufacturing Origins: The Asia-Australia Corridor

Analysis of leading sustainable mailer brands reveals a consistent reliance on offshore manufacturing. Zero Pack, an Australian-owned company, manufactures its "Zero Pack" compostable mailers in China, citing the lack of domestic Australian manufacturers capable of working with compostable resin at the required technical level.[15, 29] Similarly, Better Packaging Co. produces its "POLLAST!C" range in Southeast Asia and Vietnam, utilizing Ocean Bound Plastic collected from coastal regions where formal waste management is absent.[14, 17, 31]

Comparison of Leading Sustainable Mailer Solutions in Australia

Brand	Product Type	Manufacturing Location	Primary Material
Zero Pack	Zero Pack	China (Huizhou/Shenzhen)	Plant-based;  PBAT [32]
Better Packaging	POLLAST!C	Vietnam / SE Asia [14, 17]	Ocean Bound Plastic [16]
noissue	Recycled Poly	China (Implicit) [30]	Post-Consumer Waste [30]
RollsPack	Eco-Sense	Melbourne, Australia [13]	Recyclable LDPE (Primary facility)
JMP Retail	GECA Certified	Not Specified (Likely Import) [33]	Post-Consumer Waste (PCW)

 

While brands like RollsPack maintain primary manufacturing facilities in Melbourne (Braeside), they are forced to compete on an "uneven playing field" with imported products that benefit from significantly lower cost structures.[4, 13, 20] Furthermore, the environmental claims of these products are often undermined by Australia’s end-of-life infrastructure. Better Packaging Co. explicitly advises its Australian customers that because the REDcycle scheme is non-operational, their  recycled mailers—despite being technically recyclable—should currently be disposed of in the landfill bin.[31] This creates a situation where the environmental benefit of using recycled material is negated by the linear disposal method once it reaches Australia.

The Carbon Footprint Contradiction

One of the most complex aspects of the packaging debate is the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) comparison between plastic and its alternatives. Research from Australia Post and New Zealand Post suggests that recycled plastic satchels actually have the lowest overall environmental impact when compared to virgin plastic, compostable materials, or cardboard boxes, provided the entire lifecycle is considered.[34, 35, 36]

LCA Metrics for Shipping Satchels (Greenhouse Gas Emissions)

Material Type	Estimated Impact ()	Primary Resource Constraint
Recycled LDPE (Mechanical)		Fossil fuel feedstock (secondary) [37]
Virgin LDPE		Petroleum-based; high energy [30, 37]
Virgin Cardboard		High water usage; land intensive [35, 37]
Recycled Cardboard		Energy intensive (washing/pulping) [37]

 

However, these carbon benefits are contingent on the "avoided emissions" that come from diverting plastic from landfill. When the Australian recycling system fails, as it has for soft plastics, the "avoided emissions" column drops to zero, and the persistence of the plastic in the landfill environment becomes the dominant environmental factor. Furthermore, the transportation of recycled mailers from factories in China or Vietnam to Australian consumers adds a shipping-related carbon cost that is often excluded from brand-level marketing claims, though some studies suggest that locally produced bags from recycled materials remain the absolute lowest carbon option.[34, 38]

Sovereign Capability and the "Securing Australia’s Plastic Recycling Future" Initiative

The Australian Council of Recycling (ACOR) and the Australian Packaging Covenant Organisation (APCO) have warned that the domestic sector has reached a "tipping point".[19, 20, 39] While the federal government has provided millions in grants through the Recycling Modernization Fund (RMF), these facilities are at risk of scaling back or closing because there is no mandatory requirement for brands to buy the material they produce.

The Problem of Utilization and "Stranded Capacity"

Despite domestic reprocessing capacity nearly doubling to 600,000 tonnes, the actual recovery rate for plastic packaging in Australia remains stagnant at approximately  to .[3, 11, 40, 41] This "stranded capacity" is a direct result of the market’s failure to prioritize Australian-recycled content over cheap, unregulated imports.[18, 39, 42]

 

Waste Metric	2005 Baseline	2023-24 Reality	2050 Projection (No Action)
Plastic Waste Generated			[4, 11]
Plastic Recovery Rate			Decreasing utilization [4, 11]
Imported Plastic Products	N/A	of total	of total [3, 4]
Environmental Cost	N/A		[4]

 

The analysis by Rennie Advisory suggests that without immediate regulatory reform—specifically a mandated Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) scheme—the cumulative cost of environmental harm could exceed  billion by 2050.[4, 39]

Regulatory Pivot: The Transition to Mandatory Packaging Laws

The failures of the voluntary "Covenant" model have led to a consensus among federal and state environment ministers to introduce National Packaging Laws.[18, 39, 43] These laws are intended to shift Australia from a "take, make, waste" model to a sustainable circular economy by mandating that all packaging placed on the market meets strict design and recycled-content standards.

Key Components of the Proposed Reform

1. Mandatory Design Standards: Eliminating the use of multi-layered, non-recyclable materials in consumer packaging to ensure they can be processed by Australian MRFs.[18, 39, 43, 44]

2. Eco-Modulated Fees: Under a mandatory EPR scheme, brand owners would pay levies based on the recyclability of their packaging. Those using Australian-made recycled content would be rewarded with lower fees, while those using imported virgin plastics or non-recyclable "problematic" plastics would face significant financial penalties.[18, 39, 40, 45]

3. Traceability and Verification: To combat greenwashing and the "questionable provenance" of imported recycled resins, the National Framework for Recycled Content Traceability will require businesses to prove the origins of their materials through interoperable supply chain data.[18, 46]

4. Buy-Back Mandates: Government procurement and industry targets will be used to create a guaranteed market for domestic recyclers, ensuring that facilities like those in Taree and Smithfield can operate at full capacity.[18, 42, 47]

Advanced Recycling: The Missing Technological Link

While mechanical recycling is the current standard, it cannot solve the soft plastic problem in isolation. The "degradation" of the plastic molecule after multiple recycling cycles means that mechanical methods can only "delay the inevitable" landfilling of the material.[27] To achieve true circularity, Australia is looking toward chemical or "advanced" recycling.

Technologies like Licella’s "Cat-HTR" (Catalytic Hydrothermal Reactor) use water at high pressure and temperature to chemically break down mixed soft plastics into high-quality oil.[48, 49] This oil can be refined into new, food-grade polypropylene or polyethylene, effectively creating a "forever loop" that does not degrade the material's properties.[24, 48] A coalition of companies including Nestlé, Amcor, and Viva Energy has already successfully trialed a prototype KitKat wrapper made with  recycled polypropylene via this method, demonstrating that a pathway exists to solve the challenges of flexible packaging.[49] However, scaling this technology to process the 350,000 tonnes of household soft plastic discarded each year will require hundreds of millions of dollars in further investment and a significant increase in collection efficiency.[2, 5, 24]

The Future of E-commerce and Packaging Stewardship

As the Soft Plastics Stewardship Australia (SPSA) organization prepares to launch its new scheme, the focus is shifting toward "staged" re-introduction of collections to avoid repeating the REDcycle oversupply crisis.[1, 9, 10] The SPSA plans to fund the system through a levy of  per tonne, which will be used to build sorting and processing capacity.[1, 10, 45]

For the e-commerce industry, this means that the "free ride" of importing cheap plastic mailers is coming to an end. Under the proposed EPR model, e-commerce platforms and brand owners will be held accountable for the entire lifecycle of the shipping bags they use. This is expected to drive a shift toward mono-material recycled bags produced domestically, or toward reusable packaging systems that have the potential to avoid millions of tonnes of single-use waste.[50, 51]

Conclusion: Bridging the Circularity Gap

Australia’s soft plastic recycling failure is a cautionary tale regarding the limitations of voluntary, industry-led environmentalism in a globalized economy. The collapse of REDcycle exposed a fundamental truth: you cannot recycle what you cannot remanufacture domestically. The current reliance on overseas factories to produce "recycled" packaging from non-Australian waste streams is an environmental and economic dead end that results in a net influx of non-recyclable material into the country.

Resolving this crisis requires a radical repositioning of the recycling sector from a waste management service to a vital industrial remanufacturing chain. This transition must be supported by mandatory National Packaging Laws that level the playing field for domestic producers, enforceable design standards that eliminate technical barriers at the MRF, and the rapid scale-up of advanced recycling technologies. Only by closing the loop on Australian soil can the nation fulfill its circular economy ambitions and ensure that the "recycled" label on a shipping mailer represents a genuine environmental benefit rather than a logistical redirection to a domestic landfill. The roadmap developed by ACOR and APCO provides the evidence backbone for this shift, but its success will ultimately depend on the political will to mandate change across the entire plastic value chain.[4, 11, 39, 52]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. New soft plastics recycling scheme to replace Australia failed REDcycle, https://www.packaging-gateway.com/news/new-soft-plastics-recycling-scheme-to-replace-australia-failed-redcycle/

2. Going to waste: two years after REDcycle's collapse, Australia's soft ..., https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/02/going-to-waste-two-years-after-redcycles-collapse-australias-soft-plastics-are-hitting-the-environment-hard

3. Majority of plastic consumed in Australia ends up in landfills - INCLEAN Magazine, https://incleanmag.com.au/majority-of-plastic-consumed-in-australia-ends-up-in-landfills/

4. Securing Australia's Plastic Recycling Future : Summary Report, https://acor.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/251215-Securing-Australias-Plastic-Recycling-Future-Summary-Report.pdf

5. REDcycle's collapse and the hard truths on recycling soft plastics in Australia, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/30/redcycles-collapse-and-the-hard-truths-on-recycling-soft-plastics-in-australia

6. Rebuilding Our Soft Plastics Recycling System: The Soft Plastics Taskforce Trial - RollsPack - Flexible Packaging Solutions, https://rollspack.com.au/soft-plastics-recycling-trial-2024/

7. ACCC proposes to authorise major supermarkets to continue cooperation on soft plastics recycling, https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-proposes-to-authorise-major-supermarkets-to-continue-cooperation-on-soft-plastics-recycling

8. What's happening with soft plastic recycling? - CHOICE, https://www.choice.com.au/shopping/packaging-labelling-and-advertising/packaging/articles/soft-plastics-recycling-update

9. Update on soft plastics initiatives | Sustainable Communities and Waste Hub, https://www.nespsustainable.edu.au/update-soft-plastics-initiatives

10. A new soft plastics recycling scheme is replacing Australia's failed REDcycle. Will it mean consumers have to pay more? - The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/05/new-soft-plastics-recycling-scheme-will-replace-australia-failed-redcycle-how-will-it-work

11. Australia's amount of plastic waste surges as recycling rates fail to improve - The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/24/australias-amount-of-plastic-waste-surges-as-recycling-rates-fail-to-improve

12. WH Packing: Professional Custom Poly Mailer Manufacturer From China, https://en.whpacking.com/

13. RollsPack | Award Winning Packaging Suppliers Melbourne | We are an award winning packaging supplies company based in Melbourne Australia. We deliver plastic bags, paper bags for online retail shops based on your packaging requirements. We can source cardboard boxes or labels and store them in our warehouse, plus we have competitive freight & delivery pricing. We provide, https://rollspack.com.au/

14. Insights - Better Packaging Co, https://www.au.betterpackaging.com/blogs/insights

16. POLLAST!C 100% Recycled Poly Mailers - Better Packaging Co, https://www.betterpackaging.com/products/pollastic-recycled-poly-mailers

17. Why POLLAST!C Mailers Outperform Other Recycled Packaging: Lab-Tested Results Inside, https://www.au.betterpackaging.com/blogs/insights/why-pollastic-mailers-outperform-other-recycled-packaging-lab-tested-results-inside

18. Recycled content in packaging: Leveling the playing field for Australian recyclers, https://acor.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/241206-ACOR-Recycled-content-in-packaging.pdf

19. Australia plastics recycling sector warns of collapse, https://ecoplasticsinpackaging.com/processes/recycling/australia-plastics/

20. Australia's plastic recycling sector at “tipping point,” industry calls for reforms, https://www.packaginginsights.com/key-interviews/australia-plastic-recycling-reforms.html

21. Why Soft Plastics Are Problematic & Hard to Recycle - Banyan Nation, https://www.banyannation.com/blog/soft-plastic/

22. Soft Plastic Recycling: Challenges, Solutions, and How To Do It - Clean Vibes, https://cleanvibes.com.au/blog/soft-plastic-recycling-challenges-solutions-and-how-to-do-it/

23. Plastic Recycling in Australia: What Can and Cannot Be Recycled - Lucent Globe, https://lucentglobe.com/blogs/news/recyclable-vs-non-recyclable-plastics

24. Plastic fantastic: Inside Australia's plastics revolution - Clean Energy Finance Corporation, https://www.cefc.com.au/media/in-the-news/plastic-fantastic-inside-australia-s-plastics-revolution/

25. Soft Plastics FAQ - APCO - Australian Packaging Covenant, https://apco.org.au/what-is-soft-plastics

26. Analysis of Australia's municipal recycling infrastructure capacity, https://www.agriculture.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/waste-stocktake-report.pdf

27. The Soft Plastics Recycling Problem in Australia - Biogone, https://www.biogone.com.au/news/the-soft-plastics-recycling-problem-in-australia/

28. The hard truth about recycling plastics in Australia & globally - Ecosilk Bags, https://www.ecosilkbags.com.au/the-hard-truth-about-recycling-plastics-in-australia-globally/

29. Compostable Mailers & Shipping Bags | Hero Packaging, https://heropackaging.com.au/products/black-compostable-mailers

30. Are Poly Mailers Recyclable? - Noissue, https://noissue.co/blog/are-poly-mailers-recyclable/

31. POLLAST!C Recycled Poly Mailers - Better Packaging, https://www.au.betterpackaging.com/products/pollastic-recycled-poly-mailers

32. The Complete Guide to Compostable Packaging in 2025, https://heropackaging.com.au/blogs/news/the-complete-guide-to-compostable-packaging-in-2025

33. Good Environmental Choice Australia (GECA) Certified Recycled Mailers - JMP Retail, https://jmpretail.com.au/online-packaging/good-environmental-choice-australia-certified-recycled-mailers

34. Why Bags made from Recycled Plastic? - r3pack pty ltd, https://r3pack.com.au/pages/why-bags-made-from-recycled-plastic

35. How Australia Post is Playing Its Part in the Circular Economy with Recycled Packaging, https://powerretail.com.au/how-australia-post-is-playing-its-part-in-the-circular-economy-with-recycled-packaging/

36. Choosing Between Reusable Mailers and Poly Mailers - EcoEnclose, https://www.ecoenclose.com/blog/choosing-between-reusable-mailers-and-poly-mailers/

37. The Carbon Footprint of Recycled Packaging - Carbonfact, https://www.carbonfact.com/blog/knowledge/yawa-recycled-packaging

38. Why Choose Australian Made? A Complete Guide to Supporting Local Manufacturing in 2025 - Grounded Goods, https://groundedgoods.com.au/blogs/reusable-water-bottle-and-coffee-cup-blog/why-choose-australian-made-a-complete-guide-to-supporting-local-manufacturing-in-2025

39. Analysis shows Australia's plastic recycling future at risk - Sustainability Matters, https://www.sustainabilitymatters.net.au/content/waste/news/analysis-shows-australia-s-plastic-recycling-future-at-risk-809196910

40. Cutting Plastic Pollution at the Source: - Australian Marine Conservation Society, https://www.marineconservation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/AMCS_CuttingPlastics_Online.pdf

41. Australian Plastic Flows and Fates Study 2020-21 National Report - DCCEEW, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/protection/waste/publications/australian-plastic-flows-and-fates-report-2020-21

42. Submission 256 - Australian Council of Recycling (ACOR) - Opportunities in the circular economy - Public inquiry - Productivity Commission, https://assets.pc.gov.au/392495/sub256-circular-economy.pdf?VersionId=jqK5kIRjb.Mts2zs0qPaqhhJzOgsFo0X

43. Plastic recycling could sink or swim with Australia's planned packaging laws | Pact Group, https://pactgroup.com/news/plastic-recycling-could-sink-or-swim-with-australias-planned-packaging-laws/

44. Clean Up Australia Litter Report finds plastic remains most common, https://wastemanagementreview.com.au/clean-up-australia-litter-report-finds-plastic-remains-most-common/

45. Soft plastic recycling has changed again – here's what you need to know, https://www.marineconservation.org.au/soft-plastic-recycling-has-changed-again-heres-what-you-need-to-know/

46. A national framework for recycled content traceability - DCCEEW, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/national-framework-recycled-content-traceability.pdf

47. Soft plastics recycling is back in Australia. How does it work and where does it go? - Reddit, https://www.reddit.com/r/aus/comments/1pztwqv/soft_plastics_recycling_is_back_in_australia_how/

48. Soft plastics - Clean Up Australia, https://www.cleanup.org.au/soft-plastics-what-has-happened/

49. Nestle, food-grade recycled content, sustainable packaging, https://www.packworld.com/sustainable-packaging/article/21366124/nestle-foodgrade-recycled-content-sustainable-packaging

50. New report: Packaging consumption and recycling in Australia - National Retail Association, https://www.nationalretail.org.au/new-report-packaging-consumption-and-recycling-in-australia/

51. 50+ Online shopping packaging waste statistics that must change - Woola, https://www.woola.io/blog/online-shopping-packaging-waste-statistics

52. ACOR calls for "urgent action" on plastic packaging, https://www.packagingnews.com.au/latest/acor-calls-for-urgent-action-on-plastic-packaging